MulticommodityFlowByLagrangianRelaxation

ClassS04CS141 | recent changes | Preferences

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 18a19,23
Note: in step 3, the path p can be found using a shortest path computations,
depending on the set of paths P. For example, if P contains all paths going
from si to ti for some set of pairs of vertices {(s1,t1), (s2,t2), …, (sk, tk)},
then the path can be found using k shortest path computations.


Maximum multicommodity flow

Let G=(V,E) be a directed graph and let P be a (possibly large) collection of paths through the graph. A multicommodity flow f assigns a flow f(p) to each path p∈ P. The size of the flow, |f|, is the total flow assigned: p∈ P f(p). We let f(e) for any edge e denote the total flow sent across edge e: f(e) = p∈ P, p∋ e f(p). The congestion of the flow, cong(f), is the maximum amount of flow crossing any edge: maxe∈ E f(e). Given a budget C, the goal is to find a flow of congestion at most C maximizing the size of the flow.

Algorithm (given ε > 0):

 1. Let f(p) = 0 for each p ∈ P.
 2. Repeat until cong(f) = C :
 3.    Choose a path p ∈ P minimizing e∈ p (1+ε)f(e).
 4.    Let f(p) = f(p) + 1.  (Send a unit of flow along P.)
 5. Return f.

Note: in step 3, the path p can be found using a shortest path computations, depending on the set of paths P. For example, if P contains all paths going from si to ti for some set of pairs of vertices {(s1,t1), (s2,t2), …, (sk, tk)}, then the path can be found using k shortest path computations.

thm: Assuming C ≥ \ln(m)/ε2 and ε ≤ 1/2 the algorithm returns a flow of size at least (1-O(ε)) OPT.
proof:

Note if we could increase the congestion by at most C/|f*| in each iteration, we would converge to a minimum-congestion flow in about |f*| rounds. However, this is not possible (consider the first round, we increase congestion by 1 no matter what).
Define φ(f) = ln1+ε e∈ E (1+ε)f(e). Note that cong(f) ≤ φ(f).
φ is a "smooth" approximation of the congestion. The idea is that the algorithm chooses the path p in each iteration to (approximately) minimize the increase in φ (as a proxy for minimizing the increase in the congestion).
Fix an iteration t. Let p denote the chosen path and let ψ(e) = (1+ε)f(e) at the start of the iteration. Then, using log1+ε(1+z) ≤ (1+O(ε))z for ε < 1/2,
φ(ft) - φ(ft-1) = ln1+ε[ 1 + ε e∈ p ψ(e) / e ψ(e)] ≤ [1+O(ε)] e∈ p ψ(e) / e ψ(e).

Let f* be a maximum size flow of congestion at most C. Define a probability distribution Pr on the paths by Pr(p) = f*(p)/|f*|. If we choose a path p at random according to this probability distribution, and send 1 unit of flow along p, then the probability that a given edge e is on p is p∋ e f*(p)/|f*| ≤ C/|f*|. Thus, if we were to choose a random path p during an iteration, φ would increase in expectation by at most [1+O(ε)] C/|f*|].
Since the algorithm chooses p to minimize the increase in φ with each iteration, φ(f) increases by at most [1+O(ε)]] C/|f*|] each iteration. Thus, the algorithm maintains the invariant:
φ(f) ≤ O(ln(m)/ε) + [1+O(ε)] C |f|/|f*|].
At the end, φ(f) ≥ C (because cong(f)≤ φ(f)) so
C ≤ O(ln(m)/ε) + [1+O(ε)] C |f|/|f*|].
Rewriting and using 1/[1+O(ε)] = 1-O(ε) for ε < 1/2,
|f|/|f*| ≥ 1-O(ε) - O(ln(m)/(ε C)).


References:

ClassS04CS141 | recent changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited February 2, 2004 4:49 pm by Neal (diff)
Search: